The Challenge of Balancing Artistic Autonomy and AI Training – Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Opt-Out Mechanism under Art 4(3) DSM Directive for Artist Protection
Publicerad i Stockholm IP Law Review 2024 #1, december 2024 s. 41–50
The introduction of Article 4 of the DSM Directive was intended to create a commercial exception for text and data mining. The intention behind the article was to foster innovation and to create a legal framework to accommodate this. However, the article is not very well drafted, particularly in relation to the rise of generative AI and the training of AI systems. The article contains a reservation of use clause that allows authorsauthors to opt-out of the use of their works for text and data mining. The absence of an EU standard of opt-out declaration creates certain complications.
The AI Act initially seemed to constitute a promising solution, but the opportunity to eliminate legal uncertainties was not utilised. Instead, there is a high chance of blocking future technological innovations.
Fler artiklar från samma utgåva
Editorial
https://doi.org/10.53292/fc2b6232.5ad6a405
Publicerad i Stockholm IP Law Review 2024 #1, december 2024 s. 1–4
The Protection of Translations under European Copyright Law
https://doi.org/10.53292/fc2b6232.00682ca0
Publicerad i Stockholm IP Law Review 2024 #1, december 2024 s. 11–26